How Lunar Regolith Samples Were Collected During the Apollo Missions

During humanity’s greatest adventure to another world, Apollo astronauts did more than just plant flags and take photographs—they conducted rigorous scientific research by collecting samples of lunar regolith that continue to yield valuable insights decades later. These moon rocks and soil samples represent one of science’s most precious treasures, collected under extraordinary circumstances using specialized tools and techniques that evolved significantly throughout NASA’s Apollo program.

The Challenge of Lunar Sample Collection

Collecting geological samples on the Moon presented unique challenges that required innovative solutions. Astronauts worked in bulky spacesuits that severely limited their dexterity, making conventional geological tools impractical. The lunar environment itself—with its lower gravity, lack of atmosphere, and unfamiliar terrain—demanded specialized equipment and techniques.

NASA engineers developed tools with large-diameter, textured grips that could be manipulated despite the restrictions of pressurized gloves. Since astronauts couldn’t easily bend over in their cumbersome suits, most collection devices featured long handles or could be attached to extension handles to access the lunar surface without compromising mobility or balance.

Evolution of Lunar Sampling Equipment

Evolution of Lunar Sampling Equipment
↔️ Swipe to explore Apollo missions
11
1969
12
1969
14
1971
15
1971
16
1972
17
1972
Handheld Tools
Core Samplers
Surface Drill
Special Containers
Apollo 11 Handheld Tools
The first lunar mission utilized simple, basic collection tools. Astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin used a small aluminum scoop with a boxy design and extension handle to collect loose regolith. Tongs with a trigger-style grip mechanism allowed them to pick up small rocks without bending down.
Apollo 11’s equipment was intentionally simple since the primary mission goal was a successful landing and return. Despite the basic tools, astronauts collected 21.6 kg of lunar material including 50 rocks.
Apollo 11 Core Samplers
The first mission used narrow, thick-walled drive tubes that were not very effective. Engineers had designed them based on the incorrect assumption that lunar soil would be “fluffy” and easy to penetrate. Instead, the densely packed lunar regolith proved difficult to sample with these early tubes.
Apollo 11’s core tubes only penetrated about 10 centimeters into the regolith, providing limited subsurface samples. The cores collected still offered valuable insights into the structure of the lunar surface.
Apollo 11 Surface Drill
No surface drill was included on Apollo 11. The Apollo Lunar Surface Drill (ALSD) would be developed for later missions based on lessons learned from the initial landing.
Apollo 11 Special Containers
Apollo 11 used the first iteration of the Apollo Lunar Sample Return Container (ALSRC), nicknamed “rock boxes.” These rectangular containers were designed to maintain a vacuum seal to preserve the lunar material during the return journey to Earth.
The original rock boxes were made with aluminum and had a knife-edge seal design that closed against a soft indium gasket to maintain the integrity of the samples during transport.
Apollo 12 Handheld Tools
Apollo 12 featured modestly improved versions of the scoop and tongs used on Apollo 11. Astronauts Charles Conrad and Alan Bean used these tools along with a sample bag tool carrier that allowed them to organize collected samples more efficiently.
During Apollo 12, astronauts communicated the bag number and location details to Mission Control for each sample, beginning a more systematic approach to sample documentation.
Apollo 12 Core Samplers
Apollo 12 used similar drive tubes to Apollo 11, still struggling with the unexpectedly dense lunar soil. The mission included the collection of three core samples using these simple drive tubes, which didn’t penetrate very deeply but provided valuable information about the subsurface composition.
Sample 12028 from Apollo 12 was taken with a two-part drive tube, with the upper section retaining the designation 12028 and the lower section designated as sample 12025. Analysis revealed increasing grain size with depth—the median grain size increased from 62 micrometers at the top to 110 micrometers at the bottom.
Apollo 12 Surface Drill
Like Apollo 11, Apollo 12 did not carry the Apollo Lunar Surface Drill. NASA was still developing this technology for future missions.
Apollo 12 Special Containers
Apollo 12 featured an improved version of the ALSRC rock boxes, with minor design modifications based on Apollo 11 experience. The mission also began using more specialized sample collection bags made from Teflon and aluminum.
Apollo 14 Handheld Tools
Apollo 14 introduced the Apollo Lunar Hand Tool (ALHT) carrier, which allowed astronauts Alan Shepard and Edgar Mitchell to transport multiple tools at once. The mission also featured improved tongs and a more effective scoop design.
Apollo 14 introduced the first lunar rake tool, which allowed astronauts to efficiently gather numerous walnut-sized rocks from a large area while leaving excess soil behind.
Apollo 14 Core Samplers
Apollo 14 continued to use the same type of drive tubes as earlier missions, with similar limitations. Engineers were already working on redesigned tubes for future missions based on the lessons learned.
Apollo 14 Surface Drill
Apollo 14 marked the first use of a moderately capable drilling system, though not the full Apollo Lunar Surface Drill. This intermediate system was used primarily for obtaining core samples and for setting up experimental equipment.
Apollo 14 Special Containers
Apollo 14 introduced the first Special Environment Sample Container (SESC), which featured a stainless steel knife edge that pressed into an indium metal alloy seal, creating a gas-tight environment to preserve samples in their original condition.
Apollo 15 Handheld Tools
Apollo 15 marked a significant advancement in tool design. Astronauts David Scott and James Irwin used a significantly improved adjustable-angle, tapered scoop that proved more effective at collecting fine-grained materials. The rake tool was also refined to better collect specific-sized rock samples.
Apollo 15 was the first of the “J-missions” with extended lunar surface stays and greater scientific focus, resulting in much more sophisticated sampling equipment.
Apollo 15 Core Samplers
Apollo 15 introduced completely redesigned drive tubes with larger diameters and thinner walls. These improved tubes were much more effective, allowing astronauts to collect dust and rock fragments in nearly undisturbed condition, preserving the crucial stratigraphy that geologists sought.
The Apollo 15 redesigned core tubes could be pushed deeper into the lunar regolith and extracted with less disturbance to the sample layers, providing scientists with a much better record of how material properties changed with depth.
Apollo 15 Surface Drill
Apollo 15 was the first mission to deploy the full Apollo Lunar Surface Drill (ALSD), a sophisticated battery-operated rotary-percussion drill. The system consisted of a battery-powered motor with specialized drill bits and modular core stems.
The ALSD’s core stem segments were approximately 40 cm (16 inches) in length. By joining multiple segments together, astronauts could drill as deep as 10 feet into the lunar soil, providing unprecedented access to the Moon’s subsurface composition.
Apollo 15 Special Containers
Apollo 15 featured improved special environment containers and introduced the Gas Analysis Sample Container (GASC) for volatile sample preservation. The mission marked a significant improvement in sample preservation techniques.
Apollo 16 Handheld Tools
Apollo 16 further refined the handheld tools used on previous missions. Astronauts John Young and Charles Duke used optimized versions of the scoop, tongs, and rake designs. The tools were arranged in an improved carrier for easier access during EVAs.
Apollo 16 Core Samplers
Apollo 16 used the improved large-diameter, thin-walled drive tubes developed for Apollo 15. The mission collected several valuable core samples that provided insights into lunar geology and the history of impact events at the Descartes Highlands landing site.
Apollo 16 Surface Drill
Apollo 16 utilized the same Apollo Lunar Surface Drill design as Apollo 15, with minor improvements based on the previous mission’s experience. The mission successfully collected deep core samples that contained material from multiple lunar geological periods.
Apollo 16 Special Containers
Apollo 16 continued to use the Special Environment Sample Container (SESC) and Gas Analysis Sample Container (GASC) technologies developed for previous missions. These specialized containers maintained the scientific integrity of samples with volatile components.
Apollo 17 Handheld Tools
Apollo 17, the final Apollo mission, represented the pinnacle of lunar sampling tool development. Astronauts Eugene Cernan and Harrison “Jack” Schmitt (a professional geologist) used the most refined versions of all previous tools. Schmitt’s geological expertise influenced collection techniques and tool usage.
Having a trained geologist (Schmitt) on the crew allowed for the most scientifically valuable sample collection of any Apollo mission, demonstrating the importance of both tool design and operator expertise.
Apollo 17 Core Samplers
Apollo 17 featured the most advanced drive tubes of the program. A notable example was the double drive tube used to collect samples by hammering thin, cylindrical collection devices into a landslide deposit in the Moon’s Taurus-Littrow Valley.
Sample 73001 from Apollo 17 was first vacuum sealed on the Moon and then stored in a second protective outer vacuum tube. This sample remained sealed for nearly 50 years before being opened in 2022 as part of the Apollo Next Generation Sample Analysis Program (ANGSA).
Apollo 17 Surface Drill
Apollo 17 utilized the final iteration of the Apollo Lunar Surface Drill, representing the culmination of experience from previous missions. The drill was used not only for core sample collection but also to install heat flow experiments deeper than on previous missions.
Apollo 17’s drill operations benefited significantly from the experiences of Apollo 15 and 16, allowing for more efficient collection of deep core samples that provided a comprehensive view of the Moon’s subsurface composition.
Apollo 17 Special Containers
Apollo 17 employed the most advanced sample containment systems of the entire program. The mission featured special cold sample containers designed to preserve volatile elements that might be present in permanently shadowed regions.
Some Apollo 17 samples were kept frozen or specially sealed for future analysis with more advanced technology. Frozen Apollo 17 samples are finally being analyzed after five decades in storage, informing preparations for the Artemis program.

The tools and techniques used to collect lunar samples evolved dramatically over the course of the Apollo program as engineers incorporated lessons learned from each mission to improve subsequent collection efforts.

Handheld Collection Tools

The most basic lunar sampling equipment included tongs and rakes designed to collect small rocks without requiring astronauts to bend down. These seemingly simple tools were engineering marvels, optimized for use in a challenging environment.

The rake tool proved particularly valuable, allowing astronauts to efficiently gather numerous walnut-sized rocks from a large area while leaving excess soil behind. This aligned perfectly with the scientific goal of collecting diverse rock specimens rather than a few large samples.

For collecting lunar dust, various scoops were employed. The design of these scoops evolved substantially as astronauts gained experience with the behavior of fine lunar dust in the Moon’s low-gravity environment. Apollo 11’s boxy scoop design gave way to a much-improved adjustable-angle, tapered scoop by Apollo 15 that proved more effective at collecting fine-grained materials.

Sample collection bags were essential for organizing and preserving materials. Made from Teflon and aluminum, these cylindrical containers typically measured about 5 inches tall and 3¼ inches in diameter. They featured an aluminum top ring with a handle tab that allowed astronauts to secure samples easily despite wearing pressurized gloves. The aluminum tab and ring could be bent closed to secure the lunar material inside.

Drive Tubes and Core Samplers

Apollo Lunar Surface Drill

To study the vertical structure of lunar regolith, astronauts needed to collect undisturbed samples that preserved the original layering of materials. For this purpose, they employed core sampling devices of two main types: drive tubes that were hammered into the ground and drill cores that were mechanically inserted using a rotary/percussive motor.

Early Apollo missions (11, 12, and 14) utilized narrow, relatively thick-walled drive tubes. These early designs proved inadequate as they were developed based on incorrect assumptions about lunar soil. Scientists had expected to encounter “fluffy” dust rather than the densely packed dust and rock fragments actually present on the lunar surface. As a result, these early drive tubes typically penetrated only about 10 centimeters into the regolith.

By Apollo 15, engineers had redesigned the drive tubes with larger diameters and thinner walls. These improved tubes were much more effective, allowing astronauts to collect dust and rock fragments in nearly undisturbed condition, preserving the crucial stratigraphy that geologists sought.

A notable example was the double drive tube used during Apollo 17, where astronauts Eugene Cernan and Harrison “Jack” Schmitt collected samples by hammering thin, cylindrical collection devices into a landslide deposit in the Moon’s Taurus-Littrow Valley. This collection method captured layers of material that represented different periods in lunar history.

The Apollo Lunar Surface Drill

For deeper sampling, NASA developed the Apollo Lunar Surface Drill (ALSD), which was deployed during Apollo missions 15, 16, and 17. This sophisticated tool consisted of a cordless, battery-operated motor with specialized drill bits and modular core stems. The system served dual purposes: extracting deep soil column samples and creating holes for the placement of heat flow probes.

Each core stem segment was a rigid but hollow tube measuring approximately 40 cm (16 inches) in length. By joining multiple segments together, astronauts could drill as deep as 10 feet into the lunar soil, providing unprecedented access to the Moon’s subsurface composition. This capability represented a significant advancement over the earlier drive tubes, allowing scientists to study a much more extensive vertical profile of lunar regolith.

Techniques for Collecting Different Types of Samples

Apollo Lunar Surface Drill

The Apollo missions employed various collection techniques depending on the scientific objectives and the type of sample being gathered. Each approach was carefully designed to maximize scientific value while accommodating the practical limitations of working on the lunar surface.

Surface Sampling Methods

For surface samples, astronauts typically used tongs or rakes to collect individual rocks or scoops to gather regolith. The collection process was systematically documented to provide context for laboratory analysis. Before removing a sample, astronauts would photograph the collection site. After collection, they would take another photograph of the same location, allowing scientists to determine precisely where each sample originated relative to other lunar surface features.

An identification system was established whereby individual sample bags were numbered. As astronauts collected samples, they would communicate the bag number and location details to Mission Control. For Apollo 12 and 14, these sample bags were placed on a tool carrier and filled by hand while using a lunar scoop. This documentation process was essential for maximizing the scientific value of the collected materials.

Core Sampling for Stratigraphy

Core sampling required different techniques to preserve the vertical arrangement of materials. When using drive tubes, astronauts would carefully hammer the tube into the regolith and then extract it while minimizing disturbance to the contents. The Apollo 12 mission, for example, included the collection of three core samples using simple drive tubes. While these early samples didn’t penetrate very deeply, they provided valuable information about the subsurface composition.

Sample 12028 from Apollo 12 was taken with a two-part drive tube, with the upper section retaining the designation 12028 and the lower section designated as sample 12025. These multi-part drive tubes allowed for a more detailed analysis of how material properties changed with depth. For instance, analysis of sample 12026, collected near the Lunar Module on the northeast edge of Surveyor Crater, revealed increasing grain size with depth—the median grain size increased from 62 micrometers at the top portion to 110 micrometers at the bottom portion.

When using the ALSD on later missions, astronauts would assemble the necessary number of core stem segments, attach them to the powered drill, and carefully extract column samples that could reach much greater depths than the hand-driven tubes. This technique provided scientists with an unprecedented look at the Moon’s subsurface composition and structure.

Special Environment Sampling

Some lunar samples required special handling to preserve particular characteristics. For gases and extremely delicate samples, astronauts used specialized containers like the Special Environment Sample Container (SESC) and the Gas Analysis Sample Container (GASC). The SESC featured a stainless steel knife edge that pressed into an indium metal alloy seal, creating a gas-tight environment that preserved the sample’s original condition.

One of the most remarkable examples of special environment sampling comes from Apollo 17, where sample 73001 was first vacuum sealed on the Moon and then stored in a second protective outer vacuum tube. This sample remained sealed for nearly 50 years before being opened under the careful direction of lunar sample processors and curators at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in 2022 as part of the Apollo Next Generation Sample Analysis Program (ANGSA).

Preservation and Curation Methods

The careful collection of lunar samples would have been meaningless without equally meticulous preservation and curation techniques. NASA developed sophisticated methods to ensure that these precious materials remained in pristine condition from the moment of collection through decades of storage and analysis.

Immediate Preservation on the Moon

Sample TypeContainer UsedKey Features
Standard SamplesTeflon/Aluminum Sample BagsBent aluminum tabs to secure samples
Standard Samples (Return)Apollo Lunar Sample Return Container (ALSRC)Maintained sample integrity during Earth return
Special Environment SamplesSESC/GASCGas-tight seals preserving the original lunar environment
Vacuum-Sealed SamplesDouble-Sealed Vacuum TubesUltimate preservation for future analysis

For standard samples, astronauts placed collected materials in the numbered Teflon and aluminum sample bags. These bags were then stored in the Apollo Lunar Sample Return Container (ALSRC), commonly known as “rock boxes.” These containers were specially designed to maintain the integrity of the samples during the return journey to Earth.

For samples requiring special environmental conditions, the previously mentioned SESC and GASC containers provided gas-tight seals that preserved the original lunar environment. Sample 73001 from Apollo 17 represents perhaps the most carefully preserved lunar sample, having been vacuum sealed on the Moon before being placed in a second protective vacuum tube.

Long-term Storage and Handling

Once the samples returned to Earth, NASA implemented rigorous protocols for their storage and handling. The primary storage environment consisted of pure, dry nitrogen within specialized cleanrooms. Samples were kept in hurricane-proof vault storage to ensure their safety even during extreme weather events.

Only specific materials—stainless steel, aluminum, and Teflon—were permitted to come into contact with the samples to prevent contamination. When subdividing samples for analysis, scientists used techniques appropriate to the sample type: rocks were processed by chipping and sawing, soils through sieving and scooping, and cores through careful dissection that preserved the original stratigraphy.

Some samples were kept frozen to preserve potential volatile compounds. These required specialized handling facilities, including walk-in freezers maintained at approximately -20 degrees Celsius and glove boxes with nitrogen removed. The transportation of such sensitive samples between facilities presented significant logistical challenges, requiring dry ice surroundings and immediate transfer to freezers upon arrival.

Special Processing Techniques

For detailed analysis, scientists developed specialized processing methods. Thin sections—30 μm thick slices of epoxy-impregnated rock, soil, or soil core sections—allowed for petrographic analysis and electron beam examination. For core samples, technicians would carefully peel away thin layers to preserve the original stratigraphy. This process typically involved x-raying the core tube before opening, then methodically dissecting it to provide samples from each half-centimeter depth.

After dissection, some core surfaces were prepared for epoxy impregnation, which stabilized the material for thin section preparation. These techniques allowed scientists to examine the microscopic structure and composition of lunar materials while maintaining their original arrangement.

Scientific Legacy of Apollo Sample Collection

The Apollo lunar sample collection represents one of humanity’s most significant scientific treasures. In total, the Apollo missions returned approximately 382 kilograms (842 pounds) of lunar material to Earth. Apollo 11 alone collected 21.6 kilograms of material, including 50 rocks, samples of fine-grained lunar regolith, and two core tubes containing material from up to 13 centimeters below the Moon’s surface.

These samples have proved invaluable for understanding the Moon’s composition, formation, and history. Notably, they contain no water and provide no evidence of living organisms at any time in the Moon’s history, answering fundamental questions about our celestial neighbor.

Ongoing Research with Apollo Samples

One of the most remarkable aspects of the Apollo sample collection program was the foresight to preserve certain samples for future analysis. The Apollo Next Generation Sample Analysis Program (ANGSA) is currently studying some of the last few lunar samples that NASA has kept unopened, awaiting the development of improved scientific and technological methods.

This approach has proved prescient, as demonstrated by the recent opening of sample 73001 from Apollo 17. Kept sealed for 50 years, this sample is now being analyzed with technologies far more advanced than those available when it was collected in 1972. Scientists anticipate that this “time capsule” will provide new insights into lunar geology and potentially inform future lunar exploration.

Similarly, frozen Apollo 17 samples are finally being analyzed after five decades in storage. This research is particularly valuable as NASA prepares for the Artemis program, which aims to return humans to the Moon. Understanding how different storage techniques and the passage of time have affected lunar samples will inform how NASA treats new samples collected during upcoming missions.

Lessons Learned and Future Applications

The Apollo lunar sample collection program yielded not only valuable scientific data but also important practical lessons for future missions. Engineers and scientists documented several key insights: containers need to be easily openable; tools must be usable while wearing a spacesuit; seals must function effectively despite lunar dust contamination; and all materials must meet strict chemical compatibility requirements.

The experience gained from handling Apollo samples has directly informed preparations for the Artemis program. Processing samples in cold environments will be even more important for Artemis than it was for Apollo, as the mission targets the Moon’s South Pole, where permanently shadowed regions may contain volatile compounds that would degrade at higher temperatures.

Apollo vs. Artemis Sample Collection: Key Differences
Apollo
Artemis
A Equatorial Landing Sites
Apollo missions landed in the equatorial regions of the Moon, providing samples from areas with more direct sunlight and moderate temperatures. These sites were chosen largely for safety and accessibility rather than unique geological features.
A Rock and Regolith Composition
Apollo sample collection primarily focused on understanding the basic composition of lunar rocks and soil. Engineers designed tools like scoops, tongs, and rakes specifically to collect diverse rock samples and undisturbed regolith from the lunar surface.
A Room Temperature Processing
Most Apollo samples were processed at room temperature, with only special cases requiring freezing. The collection containers were primarily designed to prevent contamination rather than preserving volatiles, as these weren’t expected in significant quantities at the landing sites.
A Early-Stage Preservation Technology
Apollo used pioneering but relatively simple preservation methods. Samples were stored in Teflon bags with aluminum closures and transported in specially designed rock boxes. Special Environment Sample Containers were used only for specific samples requiring environmental isolation.
A Limited Sample Return Capacity
Apollo missions had relatively limited sample return capacity, with Apollo 11 returning just 21.6 kg of material. Later missions improved this capacity, but weight and space constraints of 1960s/70s spacecraft technology significantly limited sample collection.
A Polar Landing Sites
Artemis missions are targeting the lunar South Pole, including permanently shadowed regions that have never been directly sampled. These areas are believed to contain water ice and other volatile compounds preserved in the perpetually cold environment.
A Ice and Volatile Compounds
While still collecting traditional regolith samples, Artemis will place special emphasis on ice and volatile compounds that may exist in the polar regions. These materials could provide crucial resources for future lunar habitation and deeper insights into the Moon’s history.
A Extensive Cold Processing
Artemis will require sophisticated cold processing chains to preserve volatile-rich samples. The entire collection, storage, and return process must maintain specific temperatures to prevent the loss of scientifically valuable volatile compounds.
A Advanced Preservation Methods
Building on 50+ years of Apollo sample curation experience, Artemis will employ next-generation cryogenic preservation technologies. Lessons learned from the Apollo program directly inform these advanced methods, with particular attention to maintaining cold chains for volatile-rich samples.
A Enhanced Return Capabilities
Modern spacecraft design allows Artemis to return substantially more lunar material. Advanced propulsion systems, lightweight materials, and optimized cargo systems significantly increase sample return capacity compared to Apollo-era technology.

Conclusion

The collection of lunar regolith samples during the Apollo missions represents an extraordinary achievement in human exploration and scientific inquiry. Through ingenious tool design, careful collection techniques, and meticulous preservation methods, NASA astronauts gathered materials that continue to yield scientific insights five decades later.

As humanity prepares to return to the Moon through the Artemis program, the lessons learned from the Apollo sample collection remain relevant. The tools, techniques, and preservation methods developed during that era laid the groundwork for our continued exploration of the lunar surface. Additionally, the ongoing analysis of carefully preserved Apollo samples demonstrates the enduring scientific value of these materials and underscores the importance of thoughtful sample collection and curation in future missions.

The legacy of the Apollo sample collection extends beyond the scientific data obtained—it represents humanity’s ability to overcome extraordinary challenges in the pursuit of knowledge. As we look toward future lunar and planetary exploration, the methodologies developed during the Apollo era will continue to inform and inspire our scientific endeavors beyond Earth.

Want to learn more about the historic Apollo missions? Explore our other articles on apollo11space.com, covering everything from the missions’ groundbreaking technology to the astronauts who made history.

Scroll to Top